Response to "Betraying the Planet"
PLEASE TAKE YOUR TIME TO READ BROOKLYN BODEGA'S POST
My Thoughts on That
What i think may be the problem is the lack of understanding choices we have and their outcomes. While most are arguing on "..the end of the World" i believe the more serious argument is 'Do we make a move or we sit back and cross fingers ?' This is something I do not look forward to as a person with responsibilities, i am not 10 years old. Sitting here doing jack shit might or might not lead to "..the end of the World."
But let us read.
You say "keep the your money". Agreeing with lets make no moves, cross our fingers. If nothing happens there would be some minor problems but no big issues.
some of those people would be called skeptics. Skeptics are warning about the action we take. If nothing happens after we take action, how are we going to make our moany back ? speeding recession and increasing layoffs with the raise of taxes. you pick the order, or call just call it Global Depression.
Well "the world's end" came, but we defended and the damage is not much. What happens now ? The money was spent we have to make the money back reconstruct our footing and keep pushing through which also might lead to a depression.
The world ending.. Let me give you a better look on what that is. 20 feet hurricanes, floods, mass amount of animal deaths, along with the humans, people being relocated, gatherings in safe areas (from the natural disasters but not from those who lost everything already) scarce food / resources, problem after problem expect economy failures along with the environment and public health. So much more,but lets do this quick.
so now you have four sections each with different endings but one with catastrophic outcomes...Debates should not be is global warming due to humans true or false. Debates should not be rather what we see in the movie theater fiction or not. Our main concern should be WILL WE ACT QUICK, IF AT ALL !
weight your options.basically !
holla yo
-stizzi........
My Thoughts on That
What i think may be the problem is the lack of understanding choices we have and their outcomes. While most are arguing on "..the end of the World" i believe the more serious argument is 'Do we make a move or we sit back and cross fingers ?' This is something I do not look forward to as a person with responsibilities, i am not 10 years old. Sitting here doing jack shit might or might not lead to "..the end of the World."
But let us read.
You say "keep the your money". Agreeing with lets make no moves, cross our fingers. If nothing happens there would be some minor problems but no big issues.
some of those people would be called skeptics. Skeptics are warning about the action we take. If nothing happens after we take action, how are we going to make our moany back ? speeding recession and increasing layoffs with the raise of taxes. you pick the order, or call just call it Global Depression.
Well "the world's end" came, but we defended and the damage is not much. What happens now ? The money was spent we have to make the money back reconstruct our footing and keep pushing through which also might lead to a depression.
The world ending.. Let me give you a better look on what that is. 20 feet hurricanes, floods, mass amount of animal deaths, along with the humans, people being relocated, gatherings in safe areas (from the natural disasters but not from those who lost everything already) scarce food / resources, problem after problem expect economy failures along with the environment and public health. So much more,but lets do this quick.
so now you have four sections each with different endings but one with catastrophic outcomes...Debates should not be is global warming due to humans true or false. Debates should not be rather what we see in the movie theater fiction or not. Our main concern should be WILL WE ACT QUICK, IF AT ALL !
weight your options.basically !
holla yo
-stizzi........
Labels: politics
posted by Stizzi at
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
0 Comments
